Arnette

(PC) Jones v. Arnette

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20211:16-cv-01212California504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY JONES, 1:16-cv-01212-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST

vs. DEFENDANT ZAMORA, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

ARNETTE, et al., (ECF No. 89.)

Defendants. 16 I. BACKGROUND Jeremy Jones (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), U.S.C. § 12132. This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, filed on September 10, 2018, on: (1) Plaintiff’s ADA claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, Gonzales,1 Flores, Arnett,2 Zamora, and Lopez, in their official capacities; 2) Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzales; and, (3) Plaintiff’s due process claims against defendants Vasquez, Keener, and Gonzales. (ECF No. 33.)

27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.