Creamer
Creamer v. Sherer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRUCE WARREN CREAMER, No. 1:20-cv-00293-NONE-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
SUSIE SHERER, et al., (Doc. No. 14) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Bruce Warren Creamer, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the instant action on February 26, 2020. (Doc. No. 1.) On June 1, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 10.) Those findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id.) On June 14, 2021, plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. No. 11.) On June 30, 2021, the court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to dismiss this action without prejudice, entered judgment, and closed this case. …