(PC) Ruiz v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 19, 20211:20-cv-00893California1,616 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GEORGE RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00893-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL, IN

PART, AND SETTING RESPONSE DATE

v. TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 35, 36) Defendants.

14 Plaintiff George Ruiz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Generally, the complaint brings claims concerning treatment of Plaintiff and other inmates classified as STG Surenos following a fight that occurred on September 28, 2018 with the STG Bulldogs. (ECF No. 1). On July 15, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiff failed to administratively exhaust any claim brought in the complaint. (ECF No. 35). Defendants also filed a notice of request to seal documents, seeking to “to seal Exhibit B to the declarations of J. Mendez and H. Moseley filed in support of Defendants’ Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.