(PC) Lal v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20212:20-cv-00349California1,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AZHAR LAL, No. 2:20-cv-0349 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that his rights were violated in connection with extradition proceedings initiated by the United States. Presently before the court is his motion for reconsideration. (ECF No. 24.) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff has filed a motion for “reconsideration including prohibition/mandate.” (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff indicates that he is challenging the court’s September 8, 2020 order. (Id. at 1.) However, in his motion, plaintiff primarily argues that the Magistrate Judge erred in dismissing his complaint by forcing jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and failing to state how each claim was deficient. (Id. at 2-5.) The September 8, 2020 order addressed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.