Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01120-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

J. TAYLOR, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

16 On June 15, 2021, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days. (Doc. 11.) Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or a notice of dismissal or to otherwise respond to the Court’s order. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in…