(PC) Hammler v. Zydus Pharmacy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20211:21-cv-00343California851 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 1:21-cv-00343-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

ZYDUS PHARMACY, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 10, 12)

16 Plaintiff Allen Hammler is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 3, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) be denied because plaintiff has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee in full. (Doc. No. 12.) The magistrate judge provided plaintiff 14 days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff filed objections on June 21, 2021. (Doc. No. 13.) In accordance with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.