Williams v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20211:21-cv-00648California6,743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00648-AWI-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THIS

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH MAY 27, 2021 COURT

Defendants. ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

(ECF Nos. 1, 4)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

18 Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and on May 27, 2021, a screening order issued finding that Plaintiff had failed to state any cognizable claims in this action and granting him thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. More than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.