Williams v. County of Fresno
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 20, 20211:21-cv-00648California6,743 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00648-AWI-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM AND THIS
COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., MATTER BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH MAY 27, 2021 COURT
Defendants. ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
(ECF Nos. 1, 4)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
18 Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened and on May 27, 2021, a screening order issued finding that Plaintiff had failed to state any cognizable claims in this action and granting him thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. More than…