Pfeffer

(PC) Mills v. Pfeffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20211:20-cv-00195California702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL RAY MILLS, 1:20-cv-00195-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

v. COUNSEL AND GRANTING IN PART

REQUEST FOR ENLARGEMENT OF

C. PFEFFER, et al., TIME

Defendants. (Docs. 25, 26)

30-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff has filed a request for appointment of counsel and a request for a 120-day 18 extension of time. (Docs. 25, 26.) Plaintiff argues that both are necessary due to complexity of 19 the case. (Doc. 25.) Plaintiff indicates that he intends to amend his complaint to update the name 20 of Defendant Lateshia Shanae Dunn to Dunn-Johnson, and to add defendants. For the following 21 reasons, the Court DENIES the request for appointment of counsel and GRANTS in part and 22 DENIES in part Plaintiff’s request for additional time to file his first amended complaint. 23 Plaintiff previously filed two motions for appointment of counsel, which were denied by 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.