Zamora

(PC) Hayde v. Zamora

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 21, 20212:19-cv-00432California4,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC RYAN HAYDE, No. 2:19-cv-00432 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER E. ZAMORA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendant Edwardo Zamora retaliated against the plaintiff in 18 violation of his First Amendment rights and that defendant Zamora, along with defendant A. 19 Santo, violated plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection rights. 20 Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for screening (ECF No. 15) and 21 motion for extension of time (ECF No. 13). For the foregoing reason, plaintiff’s motion for 22 extension of time will be denied as moot and plaintiff will be given the option to either proceed 23 on the cognizable claims in his FAC or to submit an amended complaint.

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

25 Plaintiff filed the initial complaint in this action on March 11, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On 26 October…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.