(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE

COURT’S ORDER

CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 On June 11, 2021, the Court issued a screening order directing Plaintiff to file a first 18 amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days. (Doc. 27.) Although more 19 than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint or a notice of 20 dismissal or to otherwise respond to the Court’s order. 21 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that 22 “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for 23 the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” 24 Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and,…