Anders
Anders v. California State University, Fresno
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7 CASE: 1:21-cv-179-AWI-BAM TAYLOR ANDERS, HENNESSEY EVANS,
ABBIGAYLE ROBERTS, MEGAN
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
WALAITIS, TARA WEIR, and COURTNEY
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
WALBURGER, individually and on behalf of
all those similarly situated,
Plaintiffs, (Doc. No. 39) v.
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
FRESNO, and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendants.
16 17 18 19 On February 12, 2021, Plaintiffs brought a preliminary injunction motion that involved two claims under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. (“Title IX”): an effective accommodation claim and an equal treatment claim. Doc. No. 2. On April 21, 2021, the Court granted the motion as to the equal treatment claim and denied the motion as to the effective accommodation claim. Doc. No. 35. In the instant motion, Plaintiffs seek reconsideration of the Court’s order with respect to the effective accommodation claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Doc. No. 39-1. Specifically,…