Santoro

(PC) Schowachert v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20211:21-cv-01104California1,641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN PAUL FRANK SCHOWACHERT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01104-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

KELLEY SANTORO, et al., DISMISSED AS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE NOS. 1:21-cv-00947-GSA AND 1:21-cv- Defendants. 00975-HBK AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

DENIED AS MOOT (ECF Nos. 1, 2) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

CASE

21 Plaintiff John Paul Frank Schowachert (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) For the following reasons, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.