Estate of Antonio Thomas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:20-cv-00903California2,654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ESTATE OF ANTONIO THOMAS, et al., No. 2:20-cv-0903 KJM DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO et al., Defendants. 16 This matter came before the undersigned on March 5, 2021, for hearing of plaintiffs’ motion to compel and defendants’ motion for a protective order pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1). (ECF No. 36.) In an order filed on March 10, 2021, the undersigned found that the defendants had made “the necessary good cause showing” to justify a protective order. (ECF No. 37 at 3.) The parties were ordered to meet and confer regarding an agreed upon protective order. (Id.) If the parties could not agree upon a protective order, defendants were to file a proposed protective order. (Id.) On March 15, 2021, plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the undersigned’s March 10, 2021 order. (ECF No. 41.) On March 30, 2021, defendants filed a proposed protective order. (ECF No. 43.) On April 6, 2021, plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.