Gosai

(PC) Hicks v. Gosai

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:20-cv-02303California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARYL ANTHONY HICKS, Case No. 2:20-cv-02303-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

v. ECF No. 14 GOSAI, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 17 On June 22, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. I notified plaintiff that he had adequately alleged an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Gosai, but that his Sixth Amendment claim was not cognizable. I ordered him to notify the court whether he intended to either proceed only with his Eighth Amendment claim or file a second amended complaint. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has since filed a document that requests leave to file an “Amendment Brief” to address several issues concerning ongoing harassment. Id. Plaintiff’s filing is construed as a motion to amend the complaint, and the motion is granted. Plaintiff is warned that his second amended complaint may only include claims that are related to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.