CDCR

(PC) Blankenship v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:20-cv-02282California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTEMUS BLANKENSHIP, Case No. 2:20-cv-02282-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

CDCR, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 On February 11, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified plaintiff that the complaint failed to state a claim, and granted him sixty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on May 14, 2021, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. ECF No. 12. I notified plaintiff that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he would need to file an amended complaint. I also warned him that failure to comply with the May 14 order would…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.