Naser

(PC) Garcia v. Naser

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:21-cv-00349California482 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE LUIS GARCIA, Case No. 2:21-cv-00349-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

NASER, et al.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On April 3, 2021, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis together with his inmate trust account statement. ECF No. 9. To date, plaintiff has neither payed the required filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.