(PC) Cross v. Doe 1 John-Jane

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YOHAN CROSS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00693-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

JOHN-JANE DOE #1, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On April 30, 2021, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 9. I gave plaintiff sixty days to file an amended complaint. Id. To date, he has not done so. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh…