(PC)Flores
(PC)Flores v. California Correctional Women's Facility
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENID MARIE FLORES, 1:19-cv-01509-NONE-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DENY MOTION FOR 90-DAY
v. EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO DISMISS
CASE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL WITH A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., TO PROSECUTE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 30) 16 14-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting a fourth extension of time to respond to this Court’s screening order, issued more than a year ago on June 25, 2020. (Doc. 28.) Her first request for a 90-day extension to file the amended complaint, was due to the fact she was defending a case “in children’s court,” she was working on her divorce case. and she had been released from prison (Doc. 23). Her second request was because, though she was still out of custody, she “fell into a deep depression,” was “having difficulties concentrating on [her] cases” and had “a lot going on in [her] life.” (Doc. 26) Her third…