Perry

(PC) Venable v. Perry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:21-cv-00814California1,919 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE L. VENABLE, No. 2:21-cv-0814 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SUSAN PERRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed June 21, 2021, the undersigned screened the original complaint, found that it did not state a claim for relief, and gave plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has now filed a first amended complaint. ECF No. 10. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[] 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.