Carter

(PS) Olson v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 20212:21-cv-00929California4,598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:21-cv-00929 JAM CKD PS Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

14 JUDY CARTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff initiated this action with a pro se complaint filed on May 21, 2021. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed an application in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) The application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding and must dismiss the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (2000). In performing this screening, the court liberally construes a pro…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.