Athwal

Athwal v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20211:15-cv-00311California3,379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL, Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL

vs. (Doc. 142) COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF

TURLOCK; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY

OF CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY;

KIRK BUNCH; JON EVERS; TIMOTHY

REDD; DALE LINGERFELT; STEVE

JACOBSON; BIRGIT FLADAGER;

GALEN CARROLL; PAUL EDWARD

JONES,

Defendants.

WALTER W. WELLS and SCOTT

MCFARLANE,

19 Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 22 Defendants.

Currently before the Court are Plaintiffs Baljit Athwal and Daljit Athwal and Plaintiffs Walter Wells and Scott MacFarland’s (together the “Moving Plaintiffs”) amended motion to compel Defendants County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”) to produce responses to (1) Plaintiff Baljit Athwal’s interrogatories Nos. 12 and 13 and documents in response to Plaintiff Baljit Athwal’s Request for 28 Production Nos. 31-35 and 381, and (2) Plaintiff Wells’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.