Athwal
Athwal v. County of Stanislaus
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20211:15-cv-00311California3,379 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BALJIT ATHWAL and DALJIT ATWAL, Case No. 1:15-cv-00311-TLN-BAM
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL
vs. (Doc. 142) COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, CITY OF
TURLOCK; CITY OF MODESTO; CITY
OF CERES; STANISLAUS COUNTY
OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY;
KIRK BUNCH; JON EVERS; TIMOTHY
REDD; DALE LINGERFELT; STEVE
JACOBSON; BIRGIT FLADAGER;
GALEN CARROLL; PAUL EDWARD
JONES,
Defendants.
WALTER W. WELLS and SCOTT
MCFARLANE,
19 Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 22 Defendants.
Currently before the Court are Plaintiffs Baljit Athwal and Daljit Athwal and Plaintiffs Walter Wells and Scott MacFarland’s (together the “Moving Plaintiffs”) amended motion to compel Defendants County of Stanislaus (“Defendant”) to produce responses to (1) Plaintiff Baljit Athwal’s interrogatories Nos. 12 and 13 and documents in response to Plaintiff Baljit Athwal’s Request for 28 Production Nos. 31-35 and 381, and (2) Plaintiff Wells’…