Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20211:20-cv-01140California1,267 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY CLEVELAND and No. 1:20-cv-01140-NONE-JLT (PS)

CLEVELAND HILL ENDOWMENT,

INC., ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

Plaintiffs, THAT PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE

DONALD JOHN TRUMP, et al., (Doc. No. 18) Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Timothy Cleveland, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the complaint commencing this action in the District of Nevada on August 9, 2019, against the United States Department of Agriculture and Secretary of Agriculture George Ervin Purdue. (Doc. No. 4.) This action was transferred to this district on August 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 7.) It now proceeds on plaintiffs’ third amended complaint (“TAC”), filed on April 7, 2021. (Doc. No. 17.) The named plaintiffs are plaintiff Cleveland and plaintiff Cleveland Hill Endowment, Inc., a California non- profit entity. The named defendants are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.