Avalos

Avalos v. Nilsson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20211:20-cv-01743California1,849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE AVALOS, an individual, Case No. 1:20-cv-01743-NONE-BAM Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

BILL NILSSON, an individual; ANTHONY LAMBETECCHIO, an (Doc. 18) individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 On June 11, 2021, Plaintiff George Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed an application for default judgment against Defendant Anthony Lambetecchio. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 18.) No opposition was filed. The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court deemed the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and vacated the hearing set for July 16, 2021. (Doc. 20.) Having considered the moving papers and the record in this action, the Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be DENIED WITHOUT

…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.