Sequoia ForestKeeper v. United States Forest Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20211:21-cv-01041California7,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEQUOIA FORESTKEEPER, et al., No. 1:21-cv-01041-DAD-BAM Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, ORDER IN PART Defendant. (Doc. No. 12) 16 17 This matter came before the court on July 21, 2021 for a hearing on a motion for a temporary restraining order brought by plaintiffs Sequoia ForestKeeper (“SFK”) and Earth Island Institute (“Earth Island”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) against defendant United States Forest Service (“USFS” or “agency”). Attorneys René Voss and Matt Kenna appeared by video on behalf of plaintiffs. United States Department of Justice Trial Attorneys Hayley Carpenter and Krystal-Rose Perez and attorney James Rosen of the United States Department of Agriculture appeared by video on behalf of defendant. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing and heard oral argument, and for the reasons explained below, plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.