(PS) Storman v. Alta Regional Center

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 23, 20212:20-cv-00907California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL DAVID STORMAN, No. 2:20-cv-0907-KJM-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALTA REGIONAL CENTER, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(3). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In an order signed on December 28, 2020, plaintiff’s first amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice and plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff filed an appeal to the Ninth Circuit and the appeal was dismissed on January 28, 2021. The mandate issued on February 18, 2021. The time granted for plaintiff to file a second amended complaint has expired and plaintiff has neither filed a second amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED: 1. This action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 2. The Clerk of the Court be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.