Corpuz

(PC) Fairfield v. Corpuz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20211:19-cv-00632California6,648 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELISSA FAIRFIELD, Case No. 1:19-cv-00632-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

A. KHOO, I. SINGH, S. SINGH,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendant. (Doc. No. 52) 16 This matter was reassigned to the undersigned on November 17, 2020. (Doc. No. 51). Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment with supporting exhibits. (Doc. Nos. 52, 52-4). Defendants seek dismissal of all claims against Defendants Chief Physician and Surgeon Dr. I. Singh and Dentist S. Singh, and all claims arising after May 9, 2017 as to Defendant Dr. A. Khoo, due to Plaintiff’s failure to fully exhaust his available administrative remedies as to these claims and Defendants. (Id. at 2). Plaintiff filed a Response to Defendants’ Motion, which the court accepted as timely filed. (Doc. Nos. 56, 67). Plaintiff submitted exhibits in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.