Unknown

(HC) Sifuentez v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20212:21-cv-01244California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY SIFUENTES, Case No. 2:21-cv-01244-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING MR. SIFUENTES TO

SUBMIT A PETITION FOR WRIT OF

v. HABEAS CORPUS AND EITHER THE

FILING FEE OR AN APPLICATION TO

UNKNOWN, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Respondent. 16 Randy Sifuentes is a state prisoner without counsel. This action was opened when he submitted to the court a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. Mr. Sifuentes has not properly commenced a civil action. To commence a civil action, a party is required to file a complaint or a petition. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3; Rule 3, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 203 (2003). Challenges to the validity of confinement or the duration of confinement are properly brought in a habeas action. If Mr. Sifuentes intends to commence a federal habeas action, he must file a signed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.