Jones

(PC) Villery v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20211:15-cv-01360California2,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:15-cv-01360-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND

v. SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND THE

DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE

JAY JONES, ET. AL., (Doc. No. 132) Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to modify the discovery and scheduling order, attaching his own declaration, filed May 27, 2021. (Doc. No. 132, “Motion”; Doc. No. 132 at 9-12, “Pl. declaration”). Defendants Escarcega, Jones, Schmidt, and Yerton filed a response opposing the Motion on June 17, 2021, including declaration of attorney Arthur B. Mark. (Doc. No. 135, “Response”; Doc. No. 135-1. “Def. declaration”). Plaintiff filed a reply, including exhibits, totaling 36 pages. (Doc. No. 139, “Reply”). This matter is ripe for review. I. SUMMARY Plaintiff seeks to enlarge the dispositive motion deadline. (Doc. No. 132 at 1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.