Stevens
(PC) Kamali v. Stevens
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20211:19-cv-01432California7,286 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARBI KAMALI, 1:19-cv-01432-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS ROSE
STEVENS, IVAN VILLEGAS, JORDAN
STEVENS, et al., BRYAN, AND ALEN HERNANDEZ FOR
USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE AND
Defendants. RETALIATION; AND THAT ALL OTHER
CLAIMS BE DISMISSED FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
(ECF No. 13.)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
19 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Arbi Kamali (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 27, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and granted him leave to amend. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed on February 27, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 13.) 26 …