Stevens

(PC) Kamali v. Stevens

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20211:19-cv-01432California7,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARBI KAMALI, 1:19-cv-01432-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANTS ROSE

STEVENS, IVAN VILLEGAS, JORDAN

STEVENS, et al., BRYAN, AND ALEN HERNANDEZ FOR

USE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE AND

Defendants. RETALIATION; AND THAT ALL OTHER

CLAIMS BE DISMISSED FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

(ECF No. 13.)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Arbi Kamali (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 27, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s Complaint and granted him leave to amend. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint, filed on February 27, 2020, is currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 13.) 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.