Vasquezcoy

(PC) Hudson v. Vasquezcoy

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 26, 20211:21-cv-00861California618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 IKEEM JARMER HUDSON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00861-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL v. (ECF Nos. 7)

J. VASQUEZCOY, et al.,

14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Ikeem Jarmer Hudson is civilly committed at the Metropolitan State Hospital and proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 4). Plaintiff filed his complaint on May 28, 2021. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, concluding that only Plaintiff’s excessive-force claim against Defendant J. Vasquezcoy should proceed past screening. (ECF No. 5, p. 13). The Court allowed Plaintiff to choose between proceeding only on the claim found cognizable by the Court in the screening order, amending the complaint, or standing on the complaint subject to the Court issuing findings and recommendations to a district judge consistent with the screening order. (Id. at 13-14). On July 23, 2021, Plaintiff notified the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.