Acosta
(PC) Brookins v. Acosta
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY L. BROOKINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00401-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS2
v.
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
F. ACOSTA, (Doc. No. 12) Defendant.
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 Plaintiff Barry L. Brookins, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 12). The undersigned recommends Plaintiff be permitted to proceed with his First Amendment retaliation claim stemming from the alleged January 2018 seizure and destruction of Plaintiff’s property, but that all other claims be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. /// 26 1 The Clerk shall correct the docket to reflect F. Acosta as the sole defendant named in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 12 at 1, 3). 2 The…