Acosta

(PC) Brookins v. Acosta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20211:19-cv-00401California4,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY L. BROOKINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00401-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS NON-COGNIZABLE CLAIMS2

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

F. ACOSTA, (Doc. No. 12) Defendant.

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 Plaintiff Barry L. Brookins, proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 12). The undersigned recommends Plaintiff be permitted to proceed with his First Amendment retaliation claim stemming from the alleged January 2018 seizure and destruction of Plaintiff’s property, but that all other claims be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. /// 26 1 The Clerk shall correct the docket to reflect F. Acosta as the sole defendant named in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 12 at 1, 3). 2 The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.