Ortiz
Richardson, Jr. v. Ortiz
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VAN DARRIN RICHARDSON JR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00996 AWI JLT
Plaintiff, AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK vs. OF COURT TO REOPEN THIS CASE AND TO CLOSE THIS CASE AS TO PENSKE TRUCK RICHARD ORTIZ, et al., LEASING COMPANY ONLY (Doc. 9) Defendants.
The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed without prejudice as to Penske Truck Leasing Co. only and with each side to bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 9) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to reopen this case and to close this action as Penske Truck Leasing Co. only. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Dated: July 27, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston …