(PC) Wren v. Mule Creek Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20212:21-cv-00903California1,494 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY CHARLES WREN, No. 2:21-cv-0903 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN MULE CREEK PRISON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the action in the Fresno Division of this court. On May 19, 2021, the action was transferred to the undersigned. On July 19, 2021, the undersigned granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 32.) Instead, plaintiff filed multiple documents; and as set forth below, his motions are denied. I. Motion to Amend On July 22, 2021, plaintiff filed another motion to amend. (ECF No. 35.) Although the motion is not dated, it is clear that plaintiff did not have the July 19, 2021 order when he prepared such motion. As indicated in the July 19, 2021 order, plaintiff is not required to file a motion to amend. Rather, he must file a proposed amended complaint that is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.