Hill

Hill v. Jetblue Airways Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 27, 20212:17-cv-01604California2,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE HILL, an individual, and No. 2:17-cv-1604 WBS DB ARIEL EPSTEIN POLLACK, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 16 Defendant.

ERICKA BOHNEL, an individual, and No. 2:18-cv-0081 WBS DB ROSA MARTINEZ, an individual, 19 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 23 Defendant.

25 On July 23, 2021, this matter came before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) for hearing of defendant’s motion for discovery. Attorneys Rachel Luke and Glenn Guenard appeared via Zoom on behalf of the plaintiffs. Attorney Ashley Shively appeared via Zoom on behalf of the defendant. Oral argument was heard and the motions were taken under submission. The parties’ dispute concerns two issues: (1) plaintiffs’ Rule 35 examinations; and (2) plaintiffs’ disclosures with respect to the calculation of damages. I. Plaintiffs’ Rule 35…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.