Rodrick

(PC) Gordon v. Rodrick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20212:20-cv-00988California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARROD GORDON, No. 2:20-cv-0988 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RODRICK, Defendant. 16 On June 17, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or, in the alternative, to pay the required filing fees. See ECF No. 4. At that time, plaintiff was given thirty days within which to comply with the court’s order, and he was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed the required documents, nor has he responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.