Garcia

(CONSENT) Figures v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20212:15-cv-00894California1,935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUITA FIGURES, No. 2:15–cv–894–KJN Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE Nos. 1–3 v. (ECF No. 92.) STEVEN GARCIA and SHANE RAFTERY, in their individual capacities, 15 Defendants. 16 Before the court are defendants’ Steven Garcia and Shane Raftery’s motions in limine Nos. 1–3, regarding certain evidentiary issues to be determined before the trial set to begin on August 20, 2021, in this case. (ECF No. 92.) Over the course of briefing these motions, the parties essentially narrowed the underlying disputes to a single sentence of one expert report. (ECF Nos. 92, 93, 108.) Accordingly, the court took the motions under submission (ECF No. 109) and now, after considering the parties’ briefs, issues the following order. /// /// ///

1 All parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c), and the case was referred to the undersigned for all further proceedings, including the entry…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.