(SS) Quidor v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 28, 20212:20-cv-00117California2,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARREN KENT QUIDOR, Case No. 2:20-cv-00117-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING CLAIMANT’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

13 v. ECF No.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

Defendant. JUDGMENT ECF No. 22 18 19 Darren Quidor challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for supplemental security income and Title II disability benefits. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) found that Quidor was not disabled because he could perform both past relevant work and jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy. Quidor argues that this was error, since his conditions met or medically equaled the severity of presumptive musculoskeletal disabilities listed in the regulations. Quidor’s argument rests primarily on the significance of evidence submitted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.