Lizarraga

(PC) Tucker v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20211:19-cv-00736California5,599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREW MICHAEL TUCKER, No. 1:19-cv-00736-AWI- HBK (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ EXHAUSTION-BASED

KYLE MOHR, FNU DEMASTERS, FNU MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1

ALTSCHULER,

Doc. No. 31 Defendants. FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 Pending before the Court is the exhaustion-based motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of Defendants DeMasters and Altschulder. (see Doc. No. 31; see also Doc. No. 31-3 “Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts”). Defendants attach supporting exhibits consisting of: the declaration of Howard E. Moseley, Associate Director of the Office of Appeals, formerly known as the Appeals Branch, attaching Plaintiff’s appeal history (Doc. No. 31-4); and the declaration of D. Santos, Litigation Coordinator at Mule Creek State Prison, attaching Plaintiff’s appeal grievances (Doc. No. 31-5). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.