(PS)Thacker

(PS)Thacker v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 29, 20212:20-cv-00255California1,434 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID C. THACKER, No. 2:20-cv-00255-KJM-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS AT&T CORPORATION, et al., (ECF No. 55) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff David Thacker has settled his claims against the primary defendants, AT&T Corporation and AT&T Mobility LLC (ECF No. 49), and in response to the undersigned’s July 9, 2021 order (ECF No. 54), plaintiff now moves under Rule 41(a)(2) to voluntarily dismiss all claims against the third defendant, Diversified Consultants, Inc. (“DCI”) (ECF No. 55). The undersigned recommends granting the motion and closing this case, once all defendants are formally dismissed. On May 5, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations to construe the post-settlement joint stipulation of dismissal filed by plaintiff and the AT&T defendants as a Rule 41(a)(2) motion for voluntary dismissal—and to grant that motion. (ECF Nos. 51, 53.) Doing so seemed to be the only way…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.