(HC) James v. People of the State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:21-CV-1005-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 23, 2021, the Court dismissed Petitioner’s petition and directed Petitioner to file an amended petition within 30 days which names the appropriate state officer as the respondent. Petitioner was warned that failure to file an amended petition may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Petitioner has not complied. While Petitioner filed an amended petition on July 26, 2021, the amended petition also fails to name the correct respondent. / / / / / / / / / ] The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of 2 || dismissal. See Bautista…