Avalos

Avalos v. Southern Pacpizza, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20211:21-cv-00547California421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00547-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENT OF

DEATH TO BE SERVED ON SUCCESSOR

v. OR REPRESENTATIVE

SOUTHERN PACPIZZA, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 14)

Defendants. TEN DAY DEADLINE

16 George Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed this action on March 30, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On July 29, 2021, counsel for Plaintiff filed a statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) suggesting the death of Plaintiff. (ECF No. 14.)1 Rule 25(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a party or an action if a motion for substitution is not made within ninety days after service of a statement noting the party’s death. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). The Ninth Circuit has held that there are two affirmative steps that trigger the running of the ninety-day period in Rule 25(a)(1). See Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994). First, a party must formally suggest the death of the party upon the record. Id. (citations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.