Gomez

(PC) Thompson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 30, 20211:18-cv-00125California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK SHANE THOMPSON, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00125-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN

OPPOSITION, AND DENYING THIRD REQUEST

) A. GOMEZ, et al., FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE Defendants. ) ) (ECF No. 87) )

Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and third request for appointment of counsel, filed July 29, 2021. On the basis of good cause, the Court will grant Plaintiff’s motion for an extension. However, Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel shall be denied. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.