Lattimore

(PC) Polk v. Lattimore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20211:12-cv-01156California409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE TO FILE

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT LATTIMORE, et al., (ECF No. 147) Defendants. Opposition Due: August 16, 2021 16 17 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On July 23, 2021, Defendant Baron filed a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 147.) In that motion, Defendant incorrectly states that Plaintiff’s written opposition to the summary judgment motion “must be filed not more than fourteen days after the date of service of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.