Kelso
(PC) McCoy v. Kelso
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY, CASE NO. 12-cv-00983-AWI-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
STRONACH, et al., (Doc. No. 291) Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiff Joseph Raymond McCoy proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 12, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge denied Plaintiff’s seventh motion for appointment of counsel and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file objections to the pending findings and recommendations. Doc. No. 290. Plaintiff now objects to the July 12, 2021 order. Doc. No. 291. The Court construes Plaintiff’s objections as a motion for reconsideration. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) allows the Court to relieve a party from an order for (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial, (3)…