Martinez

(PC) Stevens v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20211:21-cv-01144California451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Case No.: 1:21-cv-01144-SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

C. MARTINEZ, 21-DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens initiated this action on July 22, 2021. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. 2.) On July 29, 2021, Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota issued an order transferring this case to the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California. (Doc. 5.) The Court has not yet ruled on Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP. According to the certified account statement submitted by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Plaintiff had $1,418.42 in her trust account on the date she filed her application to proceed IFP. (Doc. 4.) This is more than enough to pay the $402 filing fee in this action. Therefore, Plaintiff must show why she is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.