Navarro

(PC) Lear v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 2, 20211:21-cv-00600California5,327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, Case No. 1:21-cv-00600-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION NAVARRO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

Defendants. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS (ECF Nos. 1, 9, 10)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Background Plaintiff Roderick William Lear (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 13, 2021, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Defendants Navarro, Neve, Allison, and John Doe 1 for excessive force for the incident on January 4, 2020 in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims or properly joined claims against any other defendants. (ECF No. 9.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.