Asman
(PS) Schmitz v. Asman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20212:20-cv-00195California15,668 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
Case 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD Document 156 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS SCHMITZ, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00195-JAM-CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS A. ASMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 138-40, 145) Defendants.
Presently before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a fourth amended
complaint, which motion includes a request for reconsideration of the court’s prior order
dismissing with prejudice certain claims against defendants Adam Asman and Erik Bradley.
(ECF No. 145.) The court set a briefing schedule for the motion, which is related to the
previously filed and still pending motions to dismiss the currently operative Third Amended
Complaint. (ECF Nos. 138-40, 146.) The court finds the present motion suitable for resolution
without oral argument. See Local Rule…