(PC) Rodriguez v. Solano State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 3, 20212:21-cv-00622California4,902 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-00622 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants were negligent in providing plaintiff with medical care. Before the court are plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 3, 11), plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2), and plaintiff’s complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 11), deny plaintiff’s previous motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 3) as moot, and deny plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2). The court will dismiss plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 1) with leave to amend. //// //// //// //// IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.