Jasso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAIAH J. PETILLO, CASE No. 1:18-cv-01188-AWI-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO REOPEN CASE REYNALDO JASSO, et al., (Doc. 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion to “continue” the case, which the Court construes as a motion to re-open the case. (Doc. 14.) On June 10, 2019, the Court entered an order dismissing the case without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and the Court entered judgment in Defendants’ favor. (Docs. 12, 13.) Plaintiff does not state a rule of procedure, but liberally construing the complaint, the Court will treat the motion as a Rule 60 motion for the relief from a judgment or order. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Rule 60(b) provides in pertinent part: On motion and just terms, the Court may relieve a party or its legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake,…