Speiller
(PS) Expose v. Speiller
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LINDA ROSE EXPOSE, No. 2:21-cv-01035-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER
v. JUDGE STACY SPEILLER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this civil action pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 25, 2021 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On July 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF Nos. 4, 5), which have been considered by the Court. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); see also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th…